7Block Labs
Blockchain Development

ByAUJay

Summary: Vendor lock-in isn’t a theoretical risk in Web3—it shows up as BUSL-licensed forks you can’t deploy, opaque zk provers you can’t swap, and upgrade keys you don’t control. Here’s how 7Block Labs ships open, portable Solidity and ZK systems that satisfy SOC2-minded procurement while preserving future optionality and ROI.

Avoiding Vendor Lock‑in: Our Approach to Open Source Delivery

Target audience: Enterprise product, security, and procurement teams evaluating blockchain/zk initiatives that must clear SOC2, SSO/SAML, SBOM, and SLA requirements.

You shipped a PoC with a great demo… and a closed box

  • Your DEX engine or settlement contracts arrive under a Business Source License (BUSL) that defers true open use for years. Uniswap v3 launched under BUSL (later converting to GPL); v4 includes BUSL with a change date of June 15, 2027. That’s a real “no‑go” for many enterprise RFPs and forks across regions. (support.uniswap.org)
  • The zk stack is coupled to a single prover runtime. You can’t change curves, switch verifiers, or redeploy without the vendor. Meanwhile, protocol changes matter: Ethereum’s 2025 Pectra upgrade added a BLS12‑381 precompile (EIP‑2537), changing verification economics on EVM chains—if your circuits are locked to other curves or proprietary verifiers, you pay for it. (blog.ethereum.org)
  • The upgrade mechanism is controlled off‑platform. Proxies exist, but if your admin is a third party (or a SaaS bot), upgrades are their decision, not yours. OpenZeppelin now recommends UUPS with ERC‑1967 slots, but governance has to be yours from day one. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • Infra coupling sneaks in through APIs. Execution clients expose a common JSON‑RPC surface; your app should be able to switch between Erigon/Nethermind/self‑hosted and managed providers without code changes. If it can’t, you’re bound to one RPC vendor. (ethereum.org)

The real cost is missed milestones and frozen options

  • Procurement stalls: Legal can’t sign off without clear IP rights, SPDX identifiers, and an SBOM. OpenChain ISO/IEC 5230 exists precisely to streamline license compliance in procurement; skipping it slows deals. CycloneDX v1.6 is now an Ecma International standard—many buyers explicitly ask for it. (iso.org)
  • Regulatory and security drift: U.S. federal guidance continues to lean on NIST SSDF; the White House directed NIST to update SSDF in 2025 and the SSDF 1.2 draft is out. If you can’t produce SLSA‑style provenance and signed artifacts, expect longer audits and exceptions. (whitehouse.gov)
  • Engineering rework: A zk verifier hard‑coded to the wrong curve or precompile can add persistent gas overhead. EIP‑1108 lowered alt_bn128 costs years ago; Pectra introduced BLS12‑381 precompiles. If your zk verification plan didn’t anticipate these, you refactor late under deadline. (eips.exposed)
  • Operational fragility: Upgrade rights held by a vendor, a non‑portable RPC, and off‑chain data addressed by location (not content) combine into a brittle release that your SREs can’t fully own. Content addressing (IPFS CIDs) and permaweb gateways (Arweave) are standard for portable assets—skip them and you inherit someone else’s uptime. (docs.ipfs.tech)

7Block Labs’ open‑source delivery methodology (designed for Enterprise)

We bridge Solidity and ZK implementation to procurement‑grade outcomes using a repeatable, “open by default” rubric. The aim is simple: deliver systems your team can run, audit, fork, and upgrade—without us.

  1. Licensing, IP, and compliance that procurement can approve
  • Permissive licensing: We default to Apache‑2.0/MIT for all net‑new code, using SPDX short identifiers in every source file and repository‑level LICENSE/NOTICE. We avoid inbound BUSL/SSPL for production components unless Legal explicitly approves a narrow exception. (spdx.org)
  • REUSE conformance: We embed SPDX file‑level headers and include a REUSE manifest (REUSE.toml/dep5) to make license scanning deterministic during vendor reviews. (reuse.software)
  • OpenChain alignment: We package an OpenChain ISO/IEC 5230–aligned compliance folder (policies, third‑party notices, attribution) so your procurement team has the evidence up front. (iso.org)
  • SBOM and provenance: We generate CycloneDX v1.6 SBOMs for smart contracts, services, and CI build-images; we sign release artifacts and container images with Sigstore cosign (keyless via GitHub OIDC) and attach SLSA v1.1 provenance attestations. (cyclonedx.org)
  • Security posture signals: We run OpenSSF Scorecard in CI, publish results, and pin workflow actions; Scorecard findings appear in your repo’s Security tab. (github.com)
  1. Solidity upgradeability and governance you control
  • Proxy pattern: We implement UUPS proxies (ERC‑1822) using ERC‑1967 storage slots; upgrade authorization is enforced in‑contract with role‑based checks. This keeps proxies lightweight and avoids “admin‑only proxy” pitfalls. (eip.directory)
  • On‑chain governance: We wire upgrade flows to a TimelockController and a Safe (multisig) with a defined threshold. Proposals queue in timelock; any executor can finalize after delay. No off‑platform custodians. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • Key management: We deliver a runbook that migrates deployer EOAs to hardware‑backed multisig owners, sets thresholds, and documents emergency pause paths—so audit and recovery procedures are yours, not your vendor’s. (docs.safe.global)
  • Tooling: We validate storage layout upgrades using OpenZeppelin Upgrades Plugins (Hardhat/Foundry) and check for unsafe changes before any deploy. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  1. ZK designs that are portable across curves, provers, and L2s
  • Curve strategy: Post‑Pectra, EVM chains expose a BLS12‑381 precompile alongside existing BN254 (alt_bn128) precompiles. We structure circuits to target BN254 or BLS12‑381 as needed, and we plan verifier contracts per chain to minimize gas. (blog.ethereum.org)
  • Prover optionality: We prefer libraries with permissive licenses and a healthy ecosystem—gnark (Apache‑2.0), Halo2 forks (MIT/Apache‑2.0), RISC Zero (Apache‑2.0/MIT)—so you can switch backends without rewriting business logic. (github.com)
  • Verifiers and keys: We manage verifying keys and parameters as content‑addressed artifacts (CIDs) with pinned hashes and versioned migrations; changes flow through governance and timelocks to eliminate “shadow” verifier swaps. (docs.ipfs.tech)
  • Bench hygiene: We include reproducible benchmarks and a path to migrate verifiers if gas economics change (e.g., switching curves or batching pairings per EIP‑1108/2537 realities). (eips.exposed)
  1. Portability at the interface layer: RPC, data, and indexing
  • RPC independence: We adhere to Ethereum’s JSON‑RPC spec so apps can switch between managed endpoints and self‑hosted clients with configuration only. Your dapp should run against geth, Nethermind, Erigon, or reth, not a single provider’s SDK. (ethereum.org)
  • Content addressing: For off‑chain assets (front‑end bundles, metadata, proofs), we use IPFS CIDs and, when permanence matters, Arweave gateways—no location‑bound URLs. This preserves integrity and vendor independence. (docs.ipfs.tech)
  1. Security engineering: tests that survive handover
  • Static + fuzz: We wire Slither into CI and add property‑based fuzzing (Echidna/Foundry) with invariant suites focused on value conservation, authorization, and liveness. Your SREs can continue to run these post‑handover. (github.com)
  • Upgrade guards: We add “post‑audit diff checks” and storage‑gap tests to prevent silent layout drift. OpenZeppelin’s upgrade checks run before promotion. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • Audit pipeline: If you need third‑party review, we coordinate and incorporate findings into the same CI gates—then we deliver the evidence pack to procurement.

Proof: GTM metrics we commit to and how we measure them

We don’t ask you to “trust the vibe.” We set measurable targets during a 90‑day pilot and track them like any enterprise program.

  • Time‑to‑approve (Procurement): <30 days to legal approval on IP/licensing documents using OpenChain‑aligned materials (license matrix, REUSE headers, THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES) and a CycloneDX SBOM. OpenChain exists to make procurement easier by standardizing compliance expectations. (iso.org)
  • Release integrity (Security): 100% of release artifacts signed with Sigstore (keyless) and accompanied by SLSA v1.1 provenance; SBOM published per component. These directly map to current SSDF expectations and 2025 update momentum. (slsa.dev)
  • Governance control (Ops): 0 vendor‑held upgrade keys at go‑live. All upgrade paths routed through TimelockController + Safe with documented roles and SLAs. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • ZK portability (Eng): Two provers demonstrated in CI (e.g., gnark and a zkVM path), one EVM verifier swap (BN254 ↔ BLS12‑381) demonstrated against testnets; we publish gas/runtime deltas. (github.com)
  • RPC portability (SRE): Blue/green switch across at least two RPC providers and one self‑hosted client with no code changes; verified via integration tests built on Ethereum’s JSON‑RPC. (ethereum.org)

What this looks like in practice (short examples)

  • DEX engine with future‑proof licensing: We delivered a matching engine and pool contracts under Apache‑2.0 with SPDX headers and a REUSE manifest. The team avoided BUSL pitfalls seen in notable AMM releases (e.g., Uniswap’s staged BUSL → GPL/MIT approach) and cleared legal in under three weeks. (support.uniswap.org)
  • zk verifier migration post‑Pectra: A client’s original verifier assumed BN254. After Pectra introduced BLS12‑381 precompiles, we compiled a halo2‑based circuit to BLS12‑381 and swapped the verifier on an L2 staging network, showing improved verification cost profiles and keeping a BN254 path for legacy chains. (blog.ethereum.org)
  • Enterprise front‑end and data: Assets built reproducibly, pinned to IPFS CIDs, optionally mirrored to Arweave for permanence; SBOMs and SLSA attestations attached to each release artifact, signed with cosign. This enabled internal AppSec to verify supply chain integrity without exception tickets. (docs.ipfs.tech)

Why this matters for ROI (beyond engineering neatness)

  • Lower exit costs: “Exit‑ready from day one” is not a slogan; it’s your leverage in renewal negotiations.
  • Faster procurement cycles: Clear license terms + SBOM + provenance remove weeks of back‑and‑forth.
  • Reduced future gas spend: Being able to choose verifiers/curves as the EVM evolves is a compounding cost advantage. EIP‑1108 and EIP‑2537 show these shifts happen. (eips.exposed)
  • Operational resilience: Governance and infrastructure controlled by your org and content‑addressed artifacts reduce single points of failure.

How we engage (and where to start)

  • 90‑day pilot: We scope a minimal, high‑impact slice (e.g., one Solidity domain + one zk verifier + governance wiring). We deliver:
    • A fully open repo (Apache‑2.0 or MIT) with SPDX/REUSE headers, LICENSE/NOTICE, THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES. (reuse.software)
    • CI with Slither, fuzzing, test coverage, OpenSSF Scorecard, CycloneDX SBOM, and Sigstore/SLSA signing. (github.com)
    • Governance: UUPS upgrades behind TimelockController + Safe; runbooks for key rotation and emergency procedures. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
    • RPC and data portability: JSON‑RPC provider swapping and CID‑pinned assets with Arweave option. (ethereum.org)
  • Documentation that sticks: We hand over ADRs, RACI, and a SOC2‑friendly evidence pack (SBOMs, signed attestation bundles, dependency licenses).

Where 7Block fits your roadmap

Best emerging practices we recommend you adopt now

  • Treat “open‑by‑default” as a non‑functional requirement. Require SPDX/REUSE headers, OpenChain‑aligned docs, CycloneDX SBOM, and SLSA provenance in every PR. (reuse.software)
  • Design zk for curve and prover agility. Post‑Pectra, plan for BLS12‑381 verifiers on EVM while keeping BN254 paths where needed. Measure, don’t guess. (blog.ethereum.org)
  • Enforce governance on‑chain. No vendor‑held upgrade keys; upgrades flow through TimelockController + Safe with a published delay. (docs.openzeppelin.com)
  • Keep RPC and data portable. Use the JSON‑RPC spec and content addressing (IPFS/Arweave) for all off‑chain assets. (ethereum.org)
  • Show your security posture continuously. Publish Scorecard results; sign artifacts with cosign; include SBOMs. Your auditors will thank you. (github.com)

The money phrases worth repeating

  • Exit‑ready from day one.
  • No black boxes in production.
  • UUPS + Timelock + Safe = upgrades you own.
  • SBOM + SLSA + Sigstore = audit‑ready releases.
  • Curve/prover optionality preserves future gas savings.
  • JSON‑RPC and content addressing keep infra vendor‑neutral.

Book a 90‑day pilot and we’ll prove it on your codebase—measurable metrics, signed artifacts, your keys, your governance.

Call to action (Enterprise): Book a 90‑Day Pilot Strategy Call

References (selected)

Ready to de‑risk delivery and preserve your options? Book a 90‑Day Pilot Strategy Call.

Like what you're reading? Let's build together.

Get a free 30‑minute consultation with our engineering team.

Related Posts

7BlockLabs

Full-stack blockchain product studio: DeFi, dApps, audits, integrations.

7Block Labs is a trading name of JAYANTH TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED.

Registered in England and Wales (Company No. 16589283).

Registered Office address: Office 13536, 182-184 High Street North, East Ham, London, E6 2JA.

© 2025 7BlockLabs. All rights reserved.