7Block Labs
Blockchain Technology

ByAUJay

Blockchain for Supply Chain Management vs Supply Chain Management With Blockchain: A Practical Guide

Decision-makers don’t need more blockchain hype—they need a standards-first, regulation-aware roadmap that slots blockchain where it adds measurable value. This guide contrasts “blockchain for SCM” (technology-first) with “SCM with blockchain” (problem-first), and shows how to execute the latter using EPCIS 2.0, verifiable credentials, 2D barcodes, and selective on-chain anchoring.


TL;DR (Executive Summary)

  • “Blockchain for SCM” forces everything onto a ledger and often fails to scale across partners, budgets, or regulations. “SCM with blockchain” treats the chain as an integrity layer while the supply chain runs on open data standards (EPCIS 2.0, GS1 Digital Link), 2D barcodes, and verifiable credentials.
  • What’s changed since 2024: Sunrise 2027 is pushing 2D barcodes across U.S. retail; EU battery passports become mandatory on Feb 18, 2027; DSCSA enforcement exemptions stagger through 2025; the EU Deforestation Regulation’s application moved to Dec 30, 2026. Ethereum’s Dencun (EIP‑4844) slashed L2 anchoring costs, making hybrid designs cheaper. (gs1us.org)

The semantics matter: “Blockchain for SCM” vs “SCM with blockchain”

  • Blockchain for SCM = platform-first

    • Typical outcome: try to migrate master data and operational flows onto a ledger. Over-index on nodes, less on data quality and standards. Risk of supplier fatigue and thin ROI.
  • SCM with blockchain = standards-first, integrity-enabled

    • Keep operational data in fit-for-purpose systems (ERP, WMS, MES, LIMS) and an EPCIS 2.0 event backbone. Use blockchain only to notarize “who did what, when” and to verify claims (origin, custody, certifications).

A cautionary tale: IBM/Maersk TradeLens built a sophisticated global platform but shuttered in 2022 citing insufficient universal industry collaboration—proof that “platform-first” can stall even with blue-chip backers. (maersk.com)


What changed recently (and why your roadmap should)

  • 2D barcodes are going mainstream at point-of-sale. GS1’s “Sunrise 2027” targets that after 2027, 2D codes encoded with GS1 Digital Link can be scanned at POS by all retailers—enabling lot/expiry, recalls, and direct-to-consumer data from a single code. (gs1us.org)
  • EU Battery Regulation: battery passports become mandatory on Feb 18, 2027 for EV, LMT, and industrial batteries >2 kWh, accessible via on-battery QR and containing origin, carbon footprint, recycled content, and more. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
  • DSCSA: after a 2023–2024 stabilization period, the FDA issued exemptions that phased in enforcement during 2025 (manufacturers May 27; wholesalers Aug 27; larger dispensers Nov 27; small dispensers to 2026). If you’re still on paper T3s, you’re late. (fda.gov)
  • EUDR: the EU formally adopted a targeted revision postponing the application date to Dec 30, 2026 for all operators, with a further 6‑month cushion for micro and small operators—still tough, but more time to industrialize traceability. (consilium.europa.eu)
  • FSMA 204: Congress directed FDA not to enforce before July 20, 2028. Don’t wait; use the extra time to standardize KDE/CTE capture (EPCIS), not spreadsheets. (fda.gov)
  • Anchoring costs dropped: Ethereum’s Dencun (Mar 13, 2024) added EIP‑4844 “blobs,” dramatically cutting L2 data availability costs. Anchoring daily Merkle roots is now inexpensive at scale. (theblock.co)

A reference architecture that works in 2026

  1. Event backbone (EPCIS 2.0)
  • Capture Object/Aggregation/Transformation/Transaction events and sensor telemetry for each Critical Tracking Event; express identifiers as GS1 Digital Link URIs. JSON/JSON‑LD + REST removes integration friction. (gs1.org)
  1. Credential plane (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0)
  • Issue VCs for facility certifications (GFSI, RSPO, RMAP), batch provenance, battery CO2 per process step, and traceability-plan attestations. VC 2.0 is now a W3C Recommendation; use selective disclosure for privacy. (w3.org)
  1. Identity (W3C DIDs)
  • Assign DIDs to organizations, facilities, devices; bind issuers/verifiers to DID documents. DIDs became a W3C Recommendation in 2022 and underpin many data-space initiatives. (w3.org)
  1. Data spaces and policy
  • Share evidence via data-space connectors (e.g., Eclipse Tractus‑X EDC) with purpose-bound policies. Automotive’s Catena‑X demonstrates cross‑ecosystem PCF exchange and DID/VC-based participant identity. (projects.eclipse.org)
  1. Anchoring and proofs (hybrid ledger)
  • Keep raw data in your repositories; hash and Merkle‑root daily bundles (EPCIS event lists, credential status). Anchor roots on a public L2 for tamper‑evidence; use permissioned ledgers for multiparty workflows as needed. EIP‑4844 reduces cost; Hyperledger Fabric remains a solid LTS option for private channels. (eips.ethereum.org)
  1. Access at the edge (2D barcodes)
  • Encode GTIN + lot/expiry/serial and a resolver URL in GS1 Digital Link within a QR/DataMatrix. Align packaging and POS scanners for Sunrise 2027. (gs1us.org)
  1. Audit and transparency (SCITT pattern)
  • Expose verifiable “regulator views” that replay credential chains, Merkle inclusions, and policy compliance. IETF SCITT defines transparent statement architecture and APIs you can align to today. (ietf.org)

Practical, recent examples (what actually shipped)

  • Freight payments at scale: Walmart Canada’s DL Freight (Hyperledger Fabric) cut invoice disputes from ~70% to ~2%, managing ~500,000 loads annually and driving multimillion‑dollar ROI via faster, accurate payments. (walmartcanada.ca)
  • Diamonds: De Beers’ Tracr added single‑country-of‑origin disclosure for 1.25 ct+ rough (expanding to >1 ct) in 2025, with over two million diamonds registered by 2023 and two‑thirds of production by value onboard—significant movement toward verifiable provenance. (rapaport.com)
  • EV batteries: Volvo’s EX90 launched the world’s first production battery passport in 2024—app/QR access for origin, recycled content, and CO2; full regulator view retained. EU battery passports become mandatory on Feb 18, 2027. Reuters reported passport cost at roughly $10 per vehicle. (reuters.com)
  • Trade documentation: GSBN’s blockchain infrastructure and DCSA eBL standards are accelerating electronic Bills of Lading: Hapag‑Lloyd and ONE onboarded, with hundreds of thousands of eBLs issued and a path to 100% eBL by 2030 across major carriers. (gsbn.trade)

Note on food traceability: Walmart’s 2018 leafy‑greens blockchain mandate was a watershed moment; today, they emphasize FSMA‑aligned KDEs in ASNs with GS1 labels—illustrating a shift to standards-first traceability, where blockchain complements rather than replaces. (fooddive.com)


When should blockchain be on the critical path?

Use cases where blockchain adds distinctive value:

  • Multi-party financial settlement and chargeback automation (e.g., demurrage, detention, accessorials). Proven at Walmart Canada with quantifiable dispute reduction and days‑sales‑outstanding improvements. (walmartcanada.ca)
  • Proof of non‑tampering and time ordering for compliance evidence: hash‑anchored EPCIS event bundles and credential status lists, especially for DPP/battery passports and EUDR due diligence packages. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
  • Negotiable digital documents: eBLs and trade finance tokenization benefit from immutability, transfer control, and cross‑organization trust without a new central intermediary. (gsbn.trade)

Where to avoid overuse:

  • Bulk operational data and master data systems-of-record. Keep these off-chain; you’ll scale faster and comply easier while preserving data sovereignty. EPCIS 2.0 + VC 2.0 + selective anchoring is the sweet spot. (gs1.org)

Choosing the right ledger approach (2026 reality)

  • Permissioned (e.g., Hyperledger Fabric LTS 2.5): best when a defined consortium needs private channels, deterministic workflows, and enterprise IAM. Fabric remains an LTS, stable platform with active maintenance. (lf-decentralized-trust.github.io)
  • Public/hybrid: anchor Merkle roots and credential status to a public L2 for auditability. Post‑Dencun blobs make this economical for daily/weekly anchoring. (theblock.co)
  • Interoperability: if you run mixed stacks (Fabric + EVM), consider Hyperledger Cacti to bridge networks without a new settlement chain, aligning with emerging IETF SATP work. (hyperledger-cacti.github.io)

Rule of thumb: start permissioned for private workflows; add public anchors for audit and regulator trust; use data spaces + VCs for policy‑controlled data exchange.


Making regulations work for you (not the other way around)

  • EU Battery Regulation (2023/1542): implement per‑battery digital passports by Feb 18, 2027 with QR access; store model and instance data including CO2, recycled content, and due diligence. Architect for data retention across reuse/repurposing and end‑of‑life. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
  • DSCSA 2025 phasing: ensure EPCIS data exchange and interoperable systems across trading partners; align verification and exemption timelines to avoid supply disruptions. (fda.gov)
  • EUDR 2026 application: prioritize geolocation-backed traceability for cocoa, coffee, palm oil, cattle, rubber, soy, wood products; design systems to handle smallholder complexity and continuous harvesting realities. (consilium.europa.eu)
  • FSMA 204 enforcement shifted to July 20, 2028: use the window to replace spreadsheet KDE capture with EPCIS 2.0, standardize Traceability Lot Code, and drill regulator-ready “24‑hour packages.” (fda.gov)
  • Sunrise 2027: dual‑mark with U.P.C. + 2D; validate scanners, labeling, and resolvers to serve both POS and compliance/DPP needs from one code. (gs1us.org)

Privacy and IP protection without hand‑waving

  • Keep operational details off-chain; publish cryptographic commitments only.
  • Use Verifiable Credentials with selective disclosure (e.g., BBS+/SD‑JWT) for “show what’s needed, hide the rest.” (w3.org)
  • Where you must prove facts without revealing raw data (e.g., supplier lists, exact farm coordinates), add zero‑knowledge proof patterns; research and pilots demonstrate viability for emissions and provenance claims. (arxiv.org)

12‑month rollout playbook (copy/paste)

Quarter 1

  • Stand up an EPCIS 2.0 repository and map 8–12 core event types for your target product family.
  • Print pilot 2D codes (GS1 Digital Link) on SKUs; connect resolver to a product dossier.
  • Issue 2–3 VCs (e.g., facility certification, batch origin, CO2 step claim).
  • Define a Merkle/anchoring cadence (weekly); dry‑run auditor verification against sample evidence. (gs1.org)

Quarter 2

  • Onboard 25–50 suppliers; automate event capture from ERP/MES/WMS; simulate FSMA/DSCSA recall and verification drills.
  • For EU‑bound lines, start building battery/DPP fields and test QR flows. (eur-lex.europa.eu)

Quarter 3

  • Extend to 3+ sites/regions; move to dual‑marking at scale; integrate bank/eBL workflows where relevant (trade lanes). (gsbn.trade)

Quarter 4

  • Formalize governance (access policies, dispute resolution, node ops); publish a SCITT‑style transparency endpoint for regulators/auditors; conduct an external audit. (ietf.org)

Key KPIs to track:

  • Recall drill MTTR vs. baseline; % supplier onboarding; invoice dispute rate; p95 verification latency for VC presentations; % SKUs with 2D codes; evidence bundle verification pass rate.

Lessons from the field

  • Don’t start by asking suppliers to “run a node.” Start by standardizing the events and identifiers they already use—EPCIS 2.0 and GS1 keys—then progressively add credentials and anchors. (gs1.org)
  • Be pragmatic about chain choice. Fabric LTS for private channels; public L2 anchors for trust; upgrade paths exist and interop is improving. (lf-decentralized-trust.github.io)
  • Use real regulatory dates to drive scope. Battery passports (2027) and Sunrise 2027 are fixed clocks; EUDR’s 2026 application date still demands upstream readiness; FSMA’s new 2028 runway is your time to industrialize, not pause. (eur-lex.europa.eu)

What “good” looks like by this time next year

  • A searchable EPCIS 2.0 event lake covering the pilot category with >95% KDE completeness. (gs1.org)
  • Live GS1 Digital Link QR/DM on packs and cases; POS scanners validated for Sunrise 2027. (gs1us.org)
  • Verifiable credential flows for certifications and batch claims; auditor verifies cryptographic evidence in minutes. (w3.org)
  • Weekly Merkle roots anchored to a public L2; on-demand proofs of inclusion; no raw data on-chain. (theblock.co)
  • If you ship EV batteries: a battery passport MVP aligned with Annex XIII data, QR accessible, and a regulator-ready “full” view. (eur-lex.europa.eu)

Final word: Build for evidence, not headlines

“SCM with blockchain” works when you treat blockchains as integrity infrastructure—not the system of record. Anchor verifiable data you already standardize (EPCIS 2.0 events, W3C VCs), expose SCITT‑style verification endpoints, and ride the industry tailwinds (2D Sunrise 2027, eBL momentum, battery passports) to de‑risk adoption and create durable ROI. (gs1.org)


About 7Block Labs

We design and deliver standards‑first supply chain evidence layers: EPCIS 2.0 repositories, verifiable credentials, data‑space connectors, and low‑cost hybrid anchoring. If you want a pilot that’s auditor‑ready in 90 days and scalable in 12 months, let’s talk.

Like what you're reading? Let's build together.

Get a free 30‑minute consultation with our engineering team.

Related Posts

7BlockLabs

Full-stack blockchain product studio: DeFi, dApps, audits, integrations.

7Block Labs is a trading name of JAYANTH TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED.

Registered in England and Wales (Company No. 16589283).

Registered Office address: Office 13536, 182-184 High Street North, East Ham, London, E6 2JA.

© 2025 7BlockLabs. All rights reserved.