Smart Strategies to Transform Regulatory Hurdles into Product Advantages

Let’s dive into some practical yet technically sound approaches to make regulatory requirements work for you. By approaching things like the Travel Rule, sanctions checks, and ZK-based KYC as essential features, you can streamline your processes and actually boost your product’s appeal.

1. Embrace the Travel Rule

Instead of seeing the Travel Rule as a burden, think of it as a chance to enhance your product’s capabilities. By incorporating it seamlessly, you can not only comply but also offer your users added security and transparency.

2. Sanctions Checks as a Feature

Integrating sanctions checks into your workflow can be a game changer. When you treat these checks as a core aspect of your service, you can reduce delays and improve compliance without sacrificing user experience. Plus, users will appreciate the extra layer of safety.

3. Use ZK-based KYC to Your Advantage

Zero-Knowledge (ZK) based KYC solutions can be a fantastic way to maintain privacy while ensuring compliance. By making this a top feature, you can attract users who value both security and convenience. It’s a win-win!

Conclusion

By architecting these regulatory requirements into first-class features, you’ll not only meet deadlines but also cut down on those pesky review queues. It’s all about turning challenges into opportunities that drive your product forward!

If you're setting up DeFi infrastructure for regulated markets in 2026, you can definitely incorporate compliance features--like selective-disclosure credentials, attestation-gated smart accounts, and seamless Travel Rule messaging--without sacrificing user experience or profit margins.

Technical Strategies for the “Legitimacy Tax”: Coding Compliance into DeFi

• EU MiCA CASP applicants and UK-regulated crypto firms are rolling out DeFi features.
• U.S. MSBs are launching on/off-ramps and stepping into the institutional DeFi space.

Make sure to weave these key buyer terms into your internal briefs and RFPs:

• MiCA CASP authorisation
• ESMA supervisory briefing
• EBA restrictive measures guidelines
• IVMS101
• TRISA Envoy
• TRP interoperability
• 31 CFR 1010.410(f) Travel Rule
• OFAC SDN screening (IP + wallet analytics)
• EIP‑7702 smart accounts
• EIP‑7251 validator ops
• EAS attestations
• SD‑JWT VC
• BBS+ selective disclosure
• FCA 24‑hour cooling‑off “back‑end” rules

You can find more details here: esma.europa.eu

A specific technical headache you probably recognize

Between December 30, 2024, travel rules are going to kick in across the EU, and by December 30, 2025, CASPs will have to comply with those sanctions “restrictive measures.” So, it's super important for your wallet flows to get on top of a few things: you’ll need to attach the originator/beneficiary IVMS101 data for those qualifying transfers, make sure to carry out sanctions screening with clear evidence, and demonstrate that you have proper governance and outsourcing protocols in place for your NCA. Plus, with Ethereum’s Pectra upgrade (EIP‑7702), things are changing up in how EOAs can function as smart accounts, which means you might have to rewrite your wallet and policy engine. Check out more details here: (eba.europa.eu).

When you throw in the UK’s “back-end” crypto promotion rules--like the 24-hour cooling-off period, necessary risk warnings, categorization, and appropriateness checks--plus the U.S. Travel Rule requirements for transactions over $3,000 that specifically cover cryptocurrencies, you end up managing a mix of different triggers, message formats, and user experience hurdles across different regions. Check out more about the UK rules here.

What goes wrong if you don’t re‑architect now

• Missed authorization windows: ESMA’s 2025 supervisory briefing is really emphasizing that NCAs should steer clear of thin-subsidiary and over-outsourced CASP models. They’re also pushing for a solid test of executive technical skills--those paper programs won’t cut it. (esma.europa.eu)
• “Travel Rule, but brittle”: Just one hiccup from a provider can throw a wrench in your withdrawals. Chainalysis KYT reported some API/UI issues back in Sept-Oct 2025--without idempotent retries and cached risk decisions, you could end up locking user funds and breaking SLAs. (isdown.app)
• Sanctions exposure you could have prevented: OFAC is counting on you to use IP/geolocation and wallet analytics in addition to name screening. Ignoring the info you already gather has led to some serious enforcement actions. (davispolk.com)
• Conversion leakage: KYC friction and manual reviews are like roadblocks in your funnels. Industry data shows that cutting down verification times can really boost pass rates and reduce drop-offs--just what regulators expect you to balance with your duty of care. (sumsub.com)
• Wallet logic drift: Pectra/EIP‑7702 smart-account changes are shifting how signature prompts and session authority work. If your UI and policy contracts don’t correctly flag or limit delegation, you could end up creating new approval paths that slip right past compliance gates. (blog.ethereum.org)

The outcome? Missed deadlines, locked-up funds, and NCAs/FIUs requesting audit trails that you just can’t provide.

7Block Labs methodology to code compliance into your stack

We connect Solidity and ZK engineering with real-world product and operations results. Check out the playbook below; it's crafted to align with MiCA, EBA, FCA, FinCEN, and OFAC requirements, all while keeping user experience and profit margins intact.

1) Regulatory mapping → deterministic controls

• EU Travel Rule (Reg. 2023/1113) and EBA Guidelines: Make sure you're capturing originator and beneficiary data, handling missing info, and checking sanctions right from the start. These measures should kick in by December 30, 2024, and you'll need to extend those “restrictive measures” controls by December 30, 2025. Check it out here.
• UK FCA Promotions “Back-end” Rules: Build a rules engine that holds back investment flows until the cooling-off period and appropriateness checks are done. Don’t forget to keep records for audits. You can find more details here.
• U.S. Travel Rule: Establish a domestic trigger for transactions over $3,000, and if there are any changes to proposals, be sure to set cross-border thresholds. It's important to include proof that your platform sends the required data for CVC. For more info, visit this link.

We provide this mapping as executable policy tests that integrate seamlessly with your CI/CD pipeline.

2) Identity with selective disclosure (VC 2.0) + onchain attestations

• Let's go with W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0 for our issuance and verification framework. We’ll use SD-JWT VCs to ensure a smooth experience across the ecosystem, and tap into BBS+ cryptosuites when we need unlinkability or predicate proofs. Check out more about this on w3.org.
• For wallet-native gating, we’ll keep it simple by anchoring just the essential on-chain facts using the Ethereum Attestation Service (EAS). This means things like “KYC-passed by X attester in the last 12 months,” “Country ≠ embargoed,” or “Accredited investor = true”--and we'll make sure to keep any personally identifiable information off-chain. You can find more details at easscan.org.

Example: Checking a Compliance Attestation Before Approving a Swap

When it comes to swaps, making sure that the compliance attestation is in order is a must. Here’s how you might go about it:

1. Gather Required Documents
   Before diving into the details, make sure you have all the necessary documents on hand. This typically includes the compliance attestation statement and any related agreements.
2. Review the Compliance Attestation
   Take a close look at the compliance attestation itself. Ensure it’s filled out accurately and reflects the current status. Check for:
   • Valid signatures
   • The date of attestation
   • Any amendments or updates
3. Cross-Check with Regulations
   It’s important to verify that the attestation aligns with the relevant regulatory requirements. Don’t hesitate to consult the specific guidelines that are applicable to your swap transaction.
4. Engage with Relevant Parties
   If something looks off or you need clarification, reach out to the parties involved. It’s better to have a conversation than to move forward with uncertainty.
5. Document Everything
   Make sure to keep a record of your verification process. This includes any communications you had regarding the compliance attestation. Having a paper trail can be really useful!

Following these steps helps ensure that everything is on the up and up before you move forward with that swap.

// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.24;

// Minimal interface for EAS mainnet/Base; point to chain-specific EAS addresses in deployment.
interface IEAS {
    function isAttestationValid(bytes32 uid) external view returns (bool);
    function getAttestation(bytes32 uid) external view returns (
        bytes32 schema, address attester, address recipient, uint64 time, uint64 expirationTime, bool revocation
    );
}

contract ComplianceGate {
    IEAS public eas;
    bytes32 public SCHEMA_KYC_OK;         // e.g., pre-registered schema ID for "KYC_OK"
    address public TRUSTED_ATTESTER;      // your KYC provider's signer

    constructor(address _eas, bytes32 _schema, address _attester) {
        eas = IEAS(_eas);
        SCHEMA_KYC_OK = _schema;
        TRUSTED_ATTESTER = _attester;
    }

    modifier onlyCompliant(bytes32 attestationUID) {
        (, address attester, address recipient, , uint64 exp, bool revoked) = eas.getAttestation(attestationUID);
        require(attester == TRUSTED_ATTESTER, "bad attester");
        require(recipient == msg.sender, "not holder");
        require(!revoked && (exp == 0 || exp > block.timestamp), "expired/revoked");
        _;
    }

    function swap(bytes32 kycUID, address tokenIn, address tokenOut, uint256 amount)
        external
        onlyCompliant(kycUID)
    {
        // business logic ...
    }
}

• Combine the onchain attestation with an offchain VC 2.0 (like SD-JWT or BBS+) that the holder keeps stored. This way, you can meet audit requirements without putting any Personally Identifiable Information (PII) onchain. Plus, it fits perfectly with the VC 2.0’s Recommendation status as of May 15, 2025. (w3.org)

3) Smart‑account policies for EIP‑7702 and ERC‑4337 flows

• Set up a “compliance paymaster” that doesn’t allow gas sponsorship for wallets that aren’t attested; introduce session-key scopes and spending limits for EIP-7702 delegated control to prevent overly broad approvals. For more details, check out Pectra’s “From EOAs to Smart Accounts” guide. (blog.ethereum.org)

Policy Scaffold (TypeScript, Bundler Middleware)

Overview

The Policy Scaffold is a handy tool designed for managing your application’s policies in a TypeScript environment, particularly if you’re using bundler middleware. It helps you streamline your workflow and ensure your policies are consistently applied.

Getting Started

To kick things off, you'll want to set up your project with the necessary dependencies. Here’s how you can do that:

Step 1: Install Dependencies

Make sure you have the required packages installed. You can do this via NPM:

npm install --save your-bundler-middleware
npm install --save-dev typescript

Step 2: Configure TypeScript

Next, create a tsconfig.json file in your project root if you haven't already. Here's a basic example to get you started:

{
  "compilerOptions": {
    "target": "es6",
    "module": "commonjs",
    "strict": true,
    "esModuleInterop": true,
    "skipLibCheck": true,
    "forceConsistentCasingInFileNames": true
  },
  "include": ["src/**/*"],
  "exclude": ["node_modules"]
}

Creating Policies

Policies are crucial for controlling access and behavior in your application. You can create a policy like this:

Example Policy

// src/policies/examplePolicy.ts

import { Policy } from 'your-bundler-middleware';

export const examplePolicy: Policy = {
  canView: true,
  canEdit: false,
};

Applying Middleware

Now that you’ve set up your policy, you need to apply it in your middleware. Here's how:

Middleware Setup

// src/middleware/policyMiddleware.ts

import { examplePolicy } from '../policies/examplePolicy';

export const policyMiddleware = (req, res, next) => {
  req.policy = examplePolicy;
  next();
};

Conclusion

That's it! You now have a basic scaffold up and running to manage your policies in a TypeScript environment with bundler middleware. For more detailed information, check out the documentation. Happy coding!

// Pseudocode for a 4337 paymaster / 7702-aware policy check
import { verifyEAS, riskCheck, isDelegationSafe } from "./policy";

export async function preApprove(userOp: UserOperation): Promise<boolean> {
  const { sender, callData, paymasterData } = userOp;

  // 1) EAS KYC attestations
  const ok = await verifyEAS(sender, "KYC_OK", { maxAgeDays: 365 });
  if (!ok) return false;

  // 2) KYT risk screen destination(s) before signing sponsorship
  const risk = await riskCheck(extractToAddresses(callData));
  if (risk.level >= "HIGH") return false;

  // 3) If op implies 7702 delegation/session, enforce scopes & expiries
  if (!await isDelegationSafe(userOp)) return false;

  return true;
}

4) Risk pipeline with provider‑agnostic fallbacks

• Programmatic sanctions/KYT screening: let's connect the Chainalysis KYT webhooks/API with some backoff logic and ensure idempotency; also, cache the last-known-good risk for incoming transfers that aren't custodial. Remember to escalate issues only for withdrawals and redemptions. Check out the details here.
• Make sure you've got a solid plan for dealing with provider outages right from the start. Think retries, circuit breakers, and manual override queues. The incidents from 2025 really prove the importance of having continuity plans instead of just banking on one vendor. Check out the details here.

Example: Withdrawal Pre-Check

Before we dive in, let's make sure we're all set for a smooth withdrawal process. Here's a quick pre-check list you should run through:

1. Account Balance: Double-check your account balance to ensure you have enough funds.
2. Withdrawal Limits: Be aware of any daily or monthly withdrawal limits that might apply to your account.
3. Verification: Ensure your identity has been verified to avoid any hiccups.
4. Withdrawal Method: Confirm your preferred withdrawal method is set up and ready to go.
5. Processing Time: Keep in mind that different methods might have varying processing times.

By keeping these points in mind, you'll make your withdrawal experience a breeze!

// Minimalized example using Chainalysis KYT API
import fetch from "node-fetch";

async function screenAddress(userId: string, to: string) {
  const res = await fetch(`https://api.chainalysis.com/kyt/v1/users/${userId}`, {
    headers: { "Token": process.env.KYT_API_KEY, "Accept": "application/json" }
  });
  if (!res.ok) throw new Error(`KYT upstream ${res.status}`);
  const user = await res.json();
  return user?.riskScore as "LOW" | "MEDIUM" | "HIGH" | "SEVERE";
}

export async function approveWithdrawal(ctx) {
  try {
    const risk = await screenAddress(ctx.userId, ctx.to);
    if (risk === "HIGH" || risk === "SEVERE") return deny("Risk too high");
    return allow();
  } catch (e) {
    // Fallback: queue for manual review; do not block deposits; timebox approvals
    return queue("KYT unavailable, manual review");
  }
}

• Sanctions practice: make sure to include IP geoblocking, IP screening, and SDN wallet analytics; keep a “historic lookback” after new SDN designations (OFAC’s guidance actually expects this). (davispolk.com)

5) Travel Rule that actually interops

• Check out TRISA Envoy (it's open-source and self-hosted!) for exchanging IVMS101 payloads with fellow VASPs using mTLS along with a certificate authority/directory model. You can also make it work with OpenVASP/TRP. Set up a smooth pre-trade counterparty discovery and IVMS101 exchange to seamlessly connect on-chain settlements with off-chain compliance messages. (trisa.dev)
• Keep an eye on the timeline: The EBA's guidelines for the Travel Rule will kick in on December 30, 2024. Make sure to set up your enforcement workflows to get ready. Check out more info here.

Sketch of the Message Choreography (from TRISA “Standard Accept Workflow”):

Here's a visual representation of how the messages flow in the TRISA "Standard Accept Workflow." Check it out:

Key Elements:

1. Initiator: This is where it all begins, kicking off the workflow.
2. Message Exchange: The back-and-forth communication happens here, where all the important messages are sent and received.
3. Endpoints: These are the places where the messages land, making sure they get to their intended destination.
4. Acknowledgements: Don't forget these! They confirm that the messages were received successfully.
5. Error Handling: Just in case something goes wrong, this part outlines how to deal with issues that pop up.

Message Sequence:

Here's a quick rundown of the sequence:

• Step 1: Initiator sends the initial request.
• Step 2: The endpoint processes the request and replies back.
• Step 3: If everything’s good, an acknowledgment is sent.
• Step 4: In case of an error, a response with error details will be sent instead.

Summary

This choreography shows how the messages interact in the TRISA Standard Accept Workflow, ensuring everything runs smoothly from start to finish. If you want to dive deeper, you can check out the full documentation here.

• RPC1: TransferStarted (originator → beneficiary) using IVMS101 in a SecureEnvelope
• The beneficiary VASP does their KYC/sanctions check and responds with Pending/Accepted
• The originator wraps up the onchain transfer
• RPC3: Completed/Completed to wrap things up for auditing (trisa.dev)

6) Evidence and audits by construction

• Keep hashes of outgoing SD-JWT VCs and TRISA SecureEnvelopes in an internal ledger. Make sure to export regulator-ready trails that include timestamps and policy verdicts. ESMA/EBA are looking for solid evidence of governance and processes, so avoid generic policies. (esma.europa.eu)

7) Product and procurement accelerators

• In the UK, make sure to weave FCA “back-end” rules into your promotion process and keep track of user state transitions. For the EU, you’ll want to record the substance, outsourcing limits, and the technical competence mappings in your deployment runbooks--these align with ESMA’s authorisation checks. This approach helps shorten those NCA Q&A cycles and reduces risks when it comes to procurement. You can check out more details at (fca.org.uk).

Looking for an implementation partner? Our awesome blockchain development services team is here to roll out those policy engines, and our security audit services make sure everything’s good to go with the onchain/offchain handshake. When it comes to wallet UX and back-end hooks, check out our blockchain integration crew and our smart contract development whizzes.

1) Institutional Stablecoin Redemptions with Privacy-Preserving KYC

• First up, we can issue an SD-JWT VC for KYC/KYB. This lets us create a BBS+ proof that shows “jurisdiction ∉ embargoed set” and “KYC age ≤ 365d” without giving away any personal info. The holder can then anchor a simple “KYC_OK” attestation in the EAS. When it comes time to redeem, we’ll call a policy contract that checks this attestation and uses Chainalysis KYT to verify the recipient. More details can be found here: (w3.org).
• Next, EIP-7702 session keys come into play. These allow custodians to pre-sign recurring redemptions with specific spend limits. The paymaster policy makes sure these limits are enforced. If you're curious to learn more, check out this link: (blog.ethereum.org).

EU Cross-Border OTC Desk (CASP) -- Travel Rule Before Settlement

• The desk kicks things off by sending a TRISA Envoy RPC1 to the beneficiary's VASP.
• The beneficiary checks sanctions and sends back an “Accepted” response.
• Then, the originator’s orchestrator takes care of emitting the L2 transfer.
• Finally, RPC3 wraps things up by closing the compliance loop, making sure all the proof is saved for audits. (trisa.dev)

3) UK Retail Flow -- Promotions “Back-End” in Code

• To enhance customer experience, make sure to gate the “Direct Offer Financial Promotion” after the following steps: client categorization → appropriateness test → and a 24-hour cooling-off timer. Keep the journey seamless by displaying “continue/exit” options equally, as per FCA guidelines; don’t forget to reuse the results for any future offers. Check out more details on this at fca.org.uk.

Emerging best practices we recommend adopting in 2026 builds

• Go for VC 2.0 + SD‑JWT if you want to ensure that you’re compatible with a wider range of verifiers. Save BBS+ for those special cases when you need unlinkable or predicate proofs like age, residency, or risk tier. (w3.org)
• Keep personally identifiable information (PII) off the chain. Instead, use on-chain attestations (EAS) for binary or threshold facts and to track expiration status. (easscan.org)
• Make sure Travel Rule messages are idempotent and work across different chains. Don't mix up on-chain transaction hashes with the state of compliance exchanges.
• Treat sanctions and TR screening APIs as “eventually consistent.” This means you should build in retries, backoff strategies, and manual queues to help you weather any provider hiccups. (isdown.app)
• Set up your jurisdictional thresholds, like the U.S. at ≥$3,000 for domestic transactions, and keep an eye on potential cross-border proposals to dodge those pesky hotfixes. (fincen.gov)
• Clearly define your governance expectations: limit critical outsourcing, and keep documentation on local “substance” and the technical competence of executives, in line with ESMA’s briefing. (esma.europa.eu)

If you're on the lookout for cross-chain compliance tools like bridges, DEXs, or asset managers, our cross-chain solutions, DEX development services, and asset management platform development teams have got your back. We offer reusable modules to help you hit the ground running--no need to start from scratch!

GTM outcomes and metrics you can put in a board deck

• Authorization track: Let's speed up that MiCA CASP Q&A by pre-mapping “substance, outsourcing, suitability” to our org charts, runbooks, and incident playbooks. This will help us align with ESMA’s supervisory push by January 31, 2025. Our goal? Cut those pesky “questions back” cycles by 30-50%. (esma.europa.eu)
• Conversion lift: According to Sumsub’s 2025 crypto report, improving verification times really boosts pass rates and keeps drop-offs at bay. We're aiming for a 20-40% decrease in abandoned processes by using document-free flows where it makes sense and by reusing VC 2.0 credentials. (sumsub.com)
• Operational continuity: We need to create a solid design for handling analytics API incidents--think retries and caching. Recent outages have shown us just how crucial it is to have multi-vendor playbooks in place. Our target? Keep withdrawal tickets caused by “compliance system unavailable” below 0.5%. (isdown.app)
• Audit defensibility: It's time to get serious about implementing OFAC-aligned IP screening and doing some historic lookbacks when we encounter new SDN crypto addresses. We should also show that we're actively re-screening existing users and counterparties. The goal here is to have zero material findings during audits related to sanctions controls. (davispolk.com)
• Policy latency: With EIP-7702 and 4337 paymasters, we can enforce a “deny by default” policy for high-risk routes without having to wait around for UI deployments. Let’s aim for less than an hour for mean time-to-policy after we add a new rule. (blog.ethereum.org)

Our delivery programs mix engineering with go-to-market support. We connect analytics that link “policy hit rates,” “manual review minutes per ticket,” and “time-to-first-trade post-KYC” to your product KPIs--making sure compliance doesn’t drag down your board metrics.

Implementation blueprint (90 days)

• Days 0-15: Kick things off with some jurisdictional scoping. Let’s map out those flows to Reg. 2023/1113 (EU), FCA “back-end” rules (UK), and 31 CFR 1010.410(e)/(f) (U.S.). We’ll pick the VC 2.0 cryptosuite and put together the EAS schema plan. Also, get that Travel Rule messaging topology sorted out with TRISA Envoy/TRP. (eur-lex.europa.eu)
• Days 16-45: Time to roll out those attestation-gated smart accounts! We’ll develop the 4337 paymaster/7702 policy middleware and integrate a KYT provider that handles idempotent retries along with manual queues. (blog.ethereum.org)
• Days 46-70: Let’s stand up the TRISA Envoy. We’ll work on the IVMS101 schema mapping and conduct those all-important end-to-end “message→chain→message” tests. Plus, we’ll make sure the sanctions/IP screening pipeline is really solid. (trisa.dev)
• Days 71-90: Wrap up with some red team drills, covering scenarios like provider outages, sanctions lookback events, and schema revocations. We’ll finalize those audit evidence exports and hand over the runbooks for NCAs/FIUs.

Let’s dive into the world of end-to-end delivery with our web3 development services. We’re all about making your journey smooth and efficient, especially when it comes to integrating Travel Rule compliance into your projects through our blockchain bridge development.

Our services are designed to handle flows across Layer 2 solutions and sidechains, ensuring your data moves seamlessly no matter where it’s coming from or going to. With our expertise, you can trust that your delivery processes will be streamlined, secure, and up-to-date with the latest regulatory standards.

Brief in‑depth detail: VC 2.0 selective disclosure choices

• SD‑JWT VC: These are JWT-native credentials that let you selectively share info. They're super easy to plug into existing OAuth systems and are making great strides through IETF drafts. They also come with clear media types and validation rules, making them perfect for CEX/on-ramp verifiers. Check it out here.
• Data Integrity BBS+: This one’s all about pairing-based cryptography, which lets you create unlinkable derived proofs. You get enhanced privacy and stronger predicate proofs, but keep in mind that they come with bigger proof sizes and pairing costs. So, they're best suited for really sensitive claims like residency, age verification, or risk tiers. More info can be found here.
• Onchain anchor: EAS schemas offer a straightforward way to keep your chain-addressable facts (like booleans/enumerations and expiry dates) neat and tidy, while all your personal info stays tucked away in your wallet. This setup hits all the right notes with regulators’ data-minimization rules and helps shrink the risk of breaches. Dive deeper here.

What you’ll ship with 7Block Labs

• Smart contracts and paymasters that follow 7702 semantics with attestation gating
• Deployment of TRISA Envoy featuring IVMS101 mapping and ensuring protocol interoperability
• Sanctions/KYT pipelines equipped with fallbacks and observable service level objectives (SLOs)
• VC 2.0 issuance, verification, and revocation registries
• Auditor-ready exports and NCA Q&A materials

Check out our dApp development, DeFi development services, and token development services. These are all designed for the product surface area that rests on top of your compliance layer.

---

Personalized CTA

Hey there! If you're the Head of Compliance or Product at a UK-registered crypto firm aiming for MiCA authorization in the first half of 2026, and your wallet team is currently transitioning to Pectra-ready smart accounts, we’ve got something just for you.

Consider booking a 60-minute “Compliance-by-Design Architecture Review” with our top-notch Solidity and ZK engineers. During this session, we’ll dive deep into your EAS schemas, TRISA Envoy workflows, and 4337/7702 paymaster policies, making sure they align with FCA, EBA, FinCEN, and OFAC expectations.

Within five business days, we’ll deliver a prioritized, sprint-ready backlog that can really help you move forward. Oh, and here’s the best part: if we can’t pinpoint at least three “money phrases” improvements--like cutting down on manual review minutes, speeding up your time-to-first-trade post-KYC, and reducing the number of NCA Q&As--you won’t owe us a dime for the session.

Let’s get this going!