Multi-chain stablecoin expansion sprints
Fixed-scope sprints to deploy your stablecoin on a new chain: contracts, bridging via CCTP or LayerZero, tests, and runbooks, one corridor at a time.
The problem
What this engagement solves
Every new chain or corridor is a trigger for growth, but also a fresh surface of risk: redeployed contracts, bridge wiring, canonical versus bridged token decisions, and per-chain ops. Doing this ad hoc between feature work is how issuers ship inconsistent deployments and bridge bugs. A productized sprint makes each chain predictable.
What we do
How we deliver it
- Plan the deployment: canonical versus bridged token model, address strategy, and per-chain role setup.
- Deploy and verify your contracts on the target chain with matching controls and configuration.
- Wire cross-chain transfer via Circle CCTP, LayerZero, or your chosen messaging layer.
- Test the full path, mint, transfer, bridge, redeem, on testnet and in a guarded mainnet rollout.
- Hand over per-chain runbooks and monitoring so your team can operate it.
Scope
What's in scope
- Contract deployment and verification on one target chain per sprint.
- Bridge or cross-chain messaging integration via CCTP, LayerZero, or equivalent.
- Deployment scripts, configuration, and role and permission wiring.
- Testnet validation, mainnet rollout plan, and per-chain runbook.
Deliverables
What you get
- Live, verified deployment on the target chain.
- Working cross-chain transfer path with tests.
- Deployment scripts and reproducible configuration.
- Per-chain runbook and monitoring handoff.
Typical engagement
Ticket band
Typical engagement: ~$15k–$50k per chain as a fixed-scope sprint, depending on the chain and bridging model. Multi-chain programs are priced per corridor. Ranges are indicative, not quotes.
FAQ
Questions buyers ask first
How is pricing structured for several chains?
Per chain. Each chain is its own fixed-scope sprint so cost and timeline are predictable; a program across several chains is simply a sequence of sprints with shared tooling.
Canonical or bridged token, which do we use?
It depends on your liquidity, the chain, and your bridge. We help you choose between a canonical mint-and-burn model, for example via CCTP, and a lock-and-mint bridged model, then implement it consistently.
Do you support non-EVM chains?
We focus on EVM chains and the major messaging layers by default; non-EVM targets are scoped case by case.
Related
Keep exploring
Stablecoin Engineering
Senior, scoped engineering for stablecoin issuers and protocols: audit readiness, proof of reserves, and multi-chain expansion.
Audit Readiness & Remediation
Pre-audit hardening and remediation so your stablecoin contracts clear a brand-name audit with fewer findings and less back-and-forth.
Payment Orchestration
The integration glue for stablecoin payments: on/off-ramps, custody, and FX providers wired into reliable routing for B2B settlement and cross-border flows.
Scoped, productized, senior
Start with a scoping call, leave with a fixed-scope plan.
We map the work, the deliverables, and the typical engagement band to your situation before you commit to anything.